December 29, 2008

A New Year Reminder: "Stop and hear the music"





Joshua Bell Busks in the D.C. Metro - How Many People Notice?
By Vivien Schweitzer
09 Apr 2007

It may be difficult for classical music lovers to imagine Joshua Bell as just another street musician, but that's exactly what he was to the busy rush hour hordes pouring in and out of the L'Enfant Plaza Metro station in Washington, D.C.

An extensive article in The Washington Post's Sunday magazine yesterday documents an experiment carried out this past January 12, beginning at just before 8 a.m. — the middle of the morning rush hour. Bell performed six classical pieces, including the Chaconne from Bach's Partita No. 2, for about 45 minutes as 1,097 commuters, most on their way to government jobs, passed by.

His performance was organized by the Post "as an experiment in context, perception and priorities — as well as an unblinking assessment of public taste: In a banal setting at an inconvenient time, would beauty transcend?"

Joshua Bell

Apparently not. Sixty-three people marched past the violinist without a glance while he was playing the Chaconne on his 1713 Stradivarius. The Post writes that, in the 45 minutes that Joshua Bell played, seven people stopped what they were doing to listen for a minute or so, while 1,070 people hurried by without even appearing to notice.

When asked what he thought might occur during such an experiment, Leonard Slatkin, music director of the National Symphony Orchestra, said that, even assuming Bell wasn't recognized, out of 1,000 people there would be "35 or 40 who will recognize the quality for what it is. Maybe 75 to 100 will stop and spend some time listening." He added that he thought a crowd would certainly gather and that Bell would make about $150.

As it turned out, Bell earned $32 and change. The Post quotes him as saying, "That's not so bad, considering. That's 40 bucks an hour. I could make an okay living doing this, and I wouldn't have to pay an agent."

The event was pitched to Bell as a test of whether, in an unlikely setting, "ordinary people would recognize genius." Whether or not she recognized his genius, at least Brazil native Edna Souza, who has been shining shoes at L'Enfant Plaza for six years, recognized something unusual. She dislikes buskers — she says they are make too much noise and prevent her from talking with her customers, which isn't good for business.

But asked about Joshua Bell, she says while he was also "too loud," "he was pretty good, that guy. It was the first time I didn't call the police."

Still Fishing. Happy New Year ... Back in January!



December 27, 2008

A Short Break From Fishing

I am sitting around my home this morning, celebrating the aftermath of a peaceful Christmas here in upstate New York. All is well here.

But on the other side of the Atlantic, all hell continues to break loose - as the Israeli military bombs the shit out of Gaza, killing over 200, and injuring well over 300 people - men, women, and children. Israeli officials claim they had no choice!

Rarely present in the mainstream conversation about international politics is condemnation of the Israeli policy of violence waged upon the Palestinian people - it is completely absent from American discourse. President-elect Obama, vacationing on a multi-million dollar estate in Hawaii is apparently too busy with other things to comment.

Mr. President, this does not require thought, deliberation, and consideration as how to respond - picture your Hawaii compound destroyed, your two precious daughter dead at your feet, and ask yourself whether you would remain silent! Is this the NEW moral leadership you promised? Is this silence on war crimes your idea of change?

Israel needs to be condemned by the international community. By all of us. With a policy of apartheid, at its most benign, and a policy of genocidal extinction at its most malignant, Israel continues to deny water rights and a homeland to the Palestinian people - the rightful owners of all of Israel - for without the efforts of the United States and the Allies after World War II, there would be no fictitious land of Israel existing on Palestinian land.

No fucking choice????????? Give me a fucking break!

As for the rest of us ... our hearts should weep with the grief of the death of our own children, and our anger and rage should follow in kind.

Happy New Year!

Zachary Marcus

PS - let these images burn into your soul this holiday season ...



November 29, 2008

"hope and faith are more powerful than bombs and bullets"


Dalai Lama leads a better protest
By LISA VAN DUSEN

Saturday, 29 November, 2008

The carnage in Mumbai, no matter which group was responsible, was a bloody, unnecessary reminder of the lengths to which some non-state actors will go to try to force new political realities or destabilize existing ones.

One week earlier, elsewhere in India, there was an equally powerful example of how other non-state actors go about seeking change. In this case, instead of bombs and bullets they used the Internet, open dialogue and the basic tools of democracy to make a statement.

The Dalai Lama's open call for members of the Tibetan diaspora to meet Nov. 17-22 in Dharamsala, where the Tibetan government-in-exile is based, produced three results.

The first was an endorsement of the 73-year-old spiritual leader's moderate, "Middle Way" approach to dealing with China, which invaded the region in 1951 and keeps a firm lock on what it now slyly calls the Tibetan Autonomous Region.

That included backing of the Dalai Lama's decision to pull his envoys out of negotiations with Beijing, a process that has produced nothing but talk and a lot of overwrought finger-pointing about the "Dalai clique" and the "evil intent" of the benign Buddhist leader by Chinese officials.

The second was a qualifier stating, for the first time, if the approach fails to produce meaningful autonomy the international Tibetan community will launch a full-blown independence movement.

The third was a promise that the Tibetan people remain totally committed to a non-violent struggle for freedom.

In response, the government of China, which has been emboldened in its anti-Tibet stance since the economic meltdown enhanced its economic leverage over the west, cancelled an EU-China trade summit in Lyon, France, because French President Nicolas Sarkozy has a date with the spiritual leader in Poland Dec. 6. The EU's trade deficit with China was $207 billion last year, an imbalance that was to be addressed in Lyon.

China's demonization of the Dalai Lama isn't swallowed outside its own controlled propaganda environment, but it has allowed the Chinese government to pay lip service to negotiations over Tibet's political status, cultural protections and human rights because no other country has had the leverage or the courage to force legitimacy on the process.

During the run-up to the Beijing Olympics, when world attention was focused on Tibet through the Olympic torch protests and China's crackdown in Lhasa, Western leaders were unwilling or unable to leverage anything but an agreement from China to resume talks, the last round of which failed Nov. 11.

What the Dharamsala meeting showed was Tibetan exiles worldwide are getting more, not less, organized largely thanks to an active online community that is thriving despite China's efforts.

For the United States, whose influence is make or break in such conflicts, Tibet has been one of the few issues on which political leaders from both the right and the left agree.

In their farewell meeting at the APEC summit in Peru, President George W. Bush urged Chinese President Hu Jintao to resume talks with the Dalai Lama which, in the current economic context, was actually a bold diplomatic move.

The next day in Dharamsala, Karma Chophel, speaker of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile, asked in his closing remarks to the exiles meeting that the Chinese government stop "making baseless allegations against His Holiness the Dalai Lama" because it "hurts the feelings the all those people who have respect and love for His Holiness the Dalai Lama and his untiring work for world peace and universal responsibility."

Not exactly the talk of radicals.

As incoming president, Barack Obama may not have any more big-stick leverage with China but he may have an overriding interest in using softer persuasion with Beijing toward a legitimate process of establishing and protecting enough basic rights and freedoms in Tibet to counterbalance the process begun in Dharamsala.

It might also be a way to show the world that hope and faith are more powerful than bombs and bullets.

President Elect Obama's Thanksgiving Message

November 23, 2008

Welcome to America, the only industrialized nation without universal health care

It's situation critical
Sun, November 23, 2008 | Lisa Van Dusen | Sun Media

On the morning of last June 19, in the waiting room of the psychiatric ward of King's County Hospital in Brooklyn, Esmin Green slumped from her chair to the floor. She lay there for almost an hour, ignored by other patients and staff, before dying of causes still undetermined.

The hospital's closed circuit security cameras produced a video so disturbing (www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA29VwnZ4cE), that when it was released two weeks later it got worldwide attention.

Green was a 49-year-old mother of six. In the days before her death, she lost her job in a day care centre, then lost her apartment: One version of a story that will happen more and more as the economic meltdown trickles down every Main Street.

That the video of Green's death surfaced in the middle of the presidential campaign seemed like a cry for help from a system that works for fewer and fewer people at higher and higher costs.

The United States health care system is a spaghetti junction full of toll booths set up by private insurance companies that provide coverage for care in the form of HMOs (health maintenance organizations), PPOs (preferred provider organizations) and POS (point of service) programs. Most Americans (60%) get health coverage from these companies through their employers.

There are government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid for people without private insurance but roughly 15% of Americans remain uninsured. The ones who are insured interface with doctors and hospitals using a business lexicon of deductibles and co-payments and non-network treatment and paperwork unfathomable in both volume and content.

The system costs more per capita than any other on earth and represents a greater chunk of GDP (15%) than any other UN member except the Marshall Islands. The United States is the only wealthy industrialized nation that doesn't have universal health care.

When I moved to the U.S. in the early 1990s, I spent a lot of time explaining that the Canadian health care system wasn't a choice-less socialist nightmare of back-alley quacks and deadly wait times to people who couldn't believe universal health care could be so straightforward.

The most rattling culture shock then was getting used to a health care system that had the same creative accounting scandals, advertising schemes and class divides as any other business. The amount of money floating around it -- from liability insurance and personal injury attorneys to $500 bedpan suppliers to fly-by-night providers who post hand-scrawled ads on utility poles -- is staggering.

The horrors of the system chronicled in news accounts about people such as Green and by Michael Moore in the documentary Sicko happen every day and will be happening more and more a the economy worsens.

Money question

But Americans make decisions involving health coverage all the time that you never think of when it all comes down to one card in your wallet: Career choices, personal choices, where to live, what to do on a Saturday afternoon with your kids, whether to go to an emergency room.

The Canadian system has been strained in the past decade and we're a lot less self-righteous about it now, but when Canadians talk about the merits of changing it, the bottom line isn't so much the bottom line as a consensus on the value of fairness.

U.S. polls conducted before the economy dwarfed all other issues showed that most Americans share that view.

Fifteen years ago, when the Clintons tried to overhaul the U.S. health care system, resistance from the insurance lobby proved fatal.

Now, even the health insurers are admitting that change is needed (last week, two insurance lobby groups agreed to cover sick people as well as healthy ones, if they really have to) and that health care is becoming a huge economic problem.

New presidents can only focus on so many priorities and Barack Obama is a new president at a time when the things that need fixing seem outnumbered only by the obstacles to fixing them. But his reported choice of former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, who wrote the book, Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis, as Secretary of Health and Human Services, means this is a priority.

While the economy, energy, education and climate change need fixing, people aren't dying in classrooms or in gas stations because of a system that seems based on the very un-American idea that some lives are worth more than others.

November 18, 2008

"You have a new partner in the White House"

More than 600 climate change leaders from across the country and around the world convened in Los Angeles today for the opening sessions of the Global Climate Summit, a 2-day event arranged by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to break gridlock on the issue ahead of next month's United Nations Climate Change Conference in Poznan, Poland. Here are President Elect Obama's remarks:

On Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State

Keeping us sane...

November 16, 2008

Middle East factions await new president's first move


Sunday, 16 November, 2008 | Lisa Van Dusen

Not long after he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last month, former Finnish president and international peace negotiator Martti Ahtisaari, whose job demands that he choose his words carefully, described the failure of the international community to resolve the Middle East conflict as a "disgrace."

More optimistically, he added that "if the political will is there, we can solve anything," and that he hoped the new president-elect of the United States would use his first year in office to reach a permanent solution to the Israeli- Palestinian problem.

Having negotiated peace agreements in Northern Ireland (as a member of the troika that included former U.S. Senate majority leader George Mitchell and Canadian General John de Chastelain), Kosovo, Indonesia and Namibia, among others, Ahtisaari, who got a bite of the Middle East on a UN fact-finding mission into a controversial siege of the Jenin refugee camp in 2002, knows something about what's missing from a room when nothing works.

Former British prime minister Tony Blair, who has spent the past 18 months as envoy for the Quartet on the Middle East (the group of four powers -- the United States, Russia, the European Union and the United Nations -- that oversees peace efforts) also said last week it was important that the Barack Obama administration "grips this issue from day one" and makes the Middle East an urgent priority.

That Day 1 exhortation holds a caution not to repeat the mistake of the past administration's hands-off approach.

There are three weeks between the inauguration on Jan. 20 and election day in Israel on Feb. 10. Elections on either side are always about the peace process, whether it's moribund, alive and well or on life support.

While Obama will be warned not to touch the tinderbox until after the vote or risk being accused of interference, players on both sides will be watching for a sign as to whether he'll be more like George W. Bush, Bill Clinton or something in between.

Polls show Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, who took over the Kadima party when Prime Minister Ehud Olmert resigned amid corruption allegations, in a dead heat with former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the leader of the right-wing Likud party, who has made a career of selling security over peace.

Both leaders have nuanced their positions in the past week, with Livni, who as chief Israeli negotiator supports the Annapolis process begun last year, hardening her line by warning Thursday that Israel doesn't need any "dramatic" interventions in the peace process from Obama when he takes office in January.

Netanyahu, meanwhile, has softened his position that the Annapolis process should be shelved in favour of rebuilding the Palestinian economy, saying after meeting with Blair last week that he would continue peace talks with the Palestinians as well.

That was one day after Netanyahu's spokesperson said following a meeting of Israeli, Palestinian and international negotiators at Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt that there would be "no point" in continuing with Annapolis.

The Palestinians, meanwhile, are still on board. At least Fatah, which controls the West Bank, is. Palestinian President and Fatah Leader Mahmoud Abbas said at Yasser Arafat's memorial service last week that he won't agree to a peace deal without a massive release of Palestinian prisoners even as Hamas was accusing Abbas of rounding up their own usual suspects in the West Bank to force them back to bilateral Palestinian talks in Cairo.

With everything else a president-elect has on his plate, it's easy to see how the Israel-Palestinian file can be a slippery slope to that sad pantheon of former presidents, prime ministers, envoys, negotiators and chairpersons who've come and gone while the same issues sit unresolved on the table.

What Obama brings to that table, aside from enormous leverage and possibly that political will Ahtisaari called for, is a mandate for change, a fresh pair of eyes and the common sense to see the craziness.

There's also a line from his campaign speech that works well for this puzzle: "The real gamble is having the same old folks doing the same old things again and expecting a different result."

November 14, 2008

'No communion for Obama voters' ... yet another of the endless reasons to abolish organized religion!

AP - COLUMBIA, S.C. - A South Carolina Roman Catholic priest has told his parishioners that they should refrain from receiving Holy Communion if they voted for Barack Obama because the Democratic president-elect supports abortion, and supporting him "constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil."

The Rev. Jay Scott Newman said in a letter distributed Sunday to parishioners at St. Mary's Catholic Church in Greenville that they are putting their souls at risk if they take Holy Communion before doing penance for their vote.

"Our nation has chosen for its chief executive the most radical pro-abortion politician ever to serve in the United States Senate or to run for president," Newman wrote, referring to Obama by his full name, including his middle name of Hussein.

"Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exits constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ's Church and under the judgment of divine law. Persons in this condition should not receive Holy Communion until and unless they are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Penance, lest they eat and drink their own condemnation."

Risking their immortal soul
During the 2008 presidential campaign, many bishops spoke out on abortion more boldly than four years earlier, telling Catholic politicians and voters that the issue should be the most important consideration in setting policy and deciding which candidate to back. A few church leaders said parishioners risked their immortal soul by voting for candidates who support abortion rights.

But bishops differ on whether Catholic lawmakers — and voters — should refrain from receiving Communion if they diverge from church teaching on abortion. Each bishop sets policy in his own diocese. In their annual fall meeting, the nation's Catholic bishops vowed Tuesday to forcefully confront the Obama administration over its support for abortion rights.

According to national exit polls, 54 percent of Catholics chose Obama, who is Protestant. In South Carolina, which McCain carried, voters in Greenville County — traditionally seen as among the state's most conservative areas — went 61 percent for the Republican, and 37 percent for Obama.

"It was not an attempt to make a partisan point," Newman said in a telephone interview Thursday. "In fact, in this election, for the sake of argument, if the Republican candidate had been pro-abortion, and the Democratic candidate had been pro-life, everything that I wrote would have been exactly the same."

Conservative Catholics criticized Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry in 2004 for supporting abortion rights, with a few Catholic bishops saying Kerry should refrain from receiving Holy Communion because his views were contrary to church teachings.

Some say move is too extreme
Sister Mary Ann Walsh, spokeswoman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said she had not heard of other churches taking this position in reaction to Obama's win. A Boston-based group that supports Catholic Democrats questioned the move, saying it was too extreme.

"Father Newman is off-base," said Steve Krueger, national director of Catholic Democrats. "He is acting beyond the authority of a parish priest to say what he did. ... Unfortunately, he is doing so in a manner that will be of great cost to those parishioners who did vote for Sens. Obama and Biden. There will be a spiritual cost to them for his words."

A man who has attended St. Mary's for 18 years said he welcomed Newman's message and anticipated it would inspire further discussion at the church.

"I don't understand anyone who would call themselves a Christian, let alone a Catholic, and could vote for someone who's a pro-abortion candidate," said Ted Kelly, 64, who volunteers his time as lector for the church. "You're talking about the murder of innocent beings."

Never was a muzzle needed more!

The U.S. Constitution and the Last Days of George Bush

November 11, 2008

There are worse ways to go ...


Man's coffin kills wife on way to cemetery

A traffic accident hurls coffin against the back of woman's neck


PAULO, Brazil - Police say a woman has died on the way to a cemetery when a traffic accident hurled her husband's coffin against the back of her neck.

Police said 67-year-old Marciana Silva Barcelos was in the front passenger seat of the hearse when the accident occurred Monday in the southern state of Rio Grande do Sul.

Barcelos died instantly.

Her 76-year-old husband, Josi Silveira Coimbra, died Sunday of a heart attack while dancing at a party.

The driver of the hearse and Barcelos' son suffered minor injuries.

A footnote on ... America, "the ember of love" and 'California Proposition #8'

Quote of the day goes to Thomas Eugene Butler:

No more...
I will not sit at a table
where others whom I love
are not welcome."

Read the rest of Thom's thoughts - Erase My Name... Or Write It As You Will

zjm

America, "the ember of love" and 'California Proposition #8'

The following commentary by Keith Olbermann is the best thing I've heard or read on the so called social 'dilemma' of gay marriage, for it speaks to TRUE moral question of our lives: the willingness to love others as we wish to be loved.

But vital as Mr. Olbermann's piece is, it does not speak to the heart and soul of the problem of marriage confronting our society.

Marriage, historically, has been a religious ceremony that is subsequently sanctioned and recognized by the state. Period, end of story. But marriage has also, always, been a discriminatory proposition, as marriage rights and laws have not historically, nor are they today, applied to all of our citizens. If our civil authorities are going to recognize marriage in one segment of society, they must accept all, or they violate the heart and soul of the American constitution, which is at its core, 'equal rights and protection under the law.'

What we need in this country is a constitutional amendment (a fuller interpretation of said constitution) that bans civil and legal sanction of 'marriage,' and replaces it with a 'domestic partnership law' that guarantees equal rights and opportunity for any partnership of two people - whether they live together, have a religious ceremony of marriage, a civil ceremony of marriage, or none. This 'domestic partnership law' will guarantee that EVERYONE receives full and equal opportunity and protection under the law.

Under this new constitutional amendment, people of all faiths, orientations, and walks of life will also be free to also embrace any rite or ceremony they wish to (allowing them to preserve or start traditions they hold to be sacred) without comment, or sanction, from the civil authorities, including those persons who simply commit to share their lives together with passion and love (hell, even the animal rights activists, who insist animals are the same as people, can arrange a ceremony for their pets).

The biggest remaining obstacle to the fulfillment of the American Dream as a truly pluralistic society continues to reside in our stubborn refusal to abandon our mythology of being a 'Christian'/religious nation. But until we take the next evolutionary step of completely exorcising matters of 'marriage' (and God) from the law, we MUST welcome and celebrate the right of all of our citizens to marry!

It is no less than our fundamental patriotic duty.

Keith Olbermann's call to conscience offers us a way out of yet another hell we seem hell-bent on creating, and making the law of the land. PLEASE TAKE TIME TO WATCH THIS CLIP!

zjm

November 9, 2008

It Still Felt Good the Morning After


By FRANK RICH | Published: November 9, 2008| New York Times

ON the morning after a black man won the White House, America’s tears of catharsis gave way to unadulterated joy.

Our nation was still in the same ditch it had been the day before, but the atmosphere was giddy. We felt good not only because we had breached a racial barrier as old as the Republic. Dawn also brought the realization that we were at last emerging from an abusive relationship with our country’s 21st-century leaders. The festive scenes of liberation that Dick Cheney had once imagined for Iraq were finally taking place — in cities all over America.

For eight years, we’ve been told by those in power that we are small, bigoted and stupid — easily divided and easily frightened. This was the toxic catechism of Bush-Rove politics. It was the soiled banner picked up by the sad McCain campaign, and it was often abetted by an amen corner in the dominant news media. We heard this slander of America so often that we all started to believe it, liberals most certainly included. If I had a dollar for every Democrat who told me there was no way that Americans would ever turn against the war in Iraq or definitively reject Bush governance or elect a black man named Barack Hussein Obama president, I could almost start to recoup my 401(k). Few wanted to take yes for an answer.

So let’s be blunt. Almost every assumption about America that was taken as a given by our political culture on Tuesday morning was proved wrong by Tuesday night.

The most conspicuous clichés to fall, of course, were the twin suppositions that a decisive number of white Americans wouldn’t vote for a black presidential candidate — and that they were lying to pollsters about their rampant racism. But the polls were accurate. There was no “Bradley effect.” A higher percentage of white men voted for Obama than any Democrat since Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton included.

Obama also won all four of those hunting-and-Hillary-loving Rust Belt states that became 2008’s obsession among slumming upper-middle-class white journalists: Pennsylvania and Michigan by double digits, as well as Ohio and even Indiana, which has gone Democratic only once (1964) since 1936. The solid Republican South, led by Virginia and North Carolina, started to turn blue as well. While there are still bigots in America, they are in unambiguous retreat.

And what about all those terrified Jews who reportedly abandoned their progressive heritage to buy into the smears libeling Obama as an Israel-hating terrorist? Obama drew a larger percentage of Jews nationally (78) than Kerry had (74) and — mazel tov, Sarah Silverman! — won Florida.

Let’s defend Hispanic-Americans, too, while we’re at it. In one of the more notorious observations of the campaign year, a Clinton pollster, Sergio Bendixen, told The New Yorker in January that “the Hispanic voter — and I want to say this very carefully — has not shown a lot of willingness or affinity to support black candidates.” Let us say very carefully that a black presidential candidate won Latinos — the fastest-growing demographic in the electorate — 67 percent to 31 (up from Kerry’s 53-to-44 edge and Gore’s 62-to-35).

Young voters also triumphed over the condescension of the experts. “Are they going to show up?” Cokie Roberts of ABC News asked in February. “Probably not. They never have before. By the time November comes, they’ll be tired.” In fact they turned up in larger numbers than in 2004, and their disproportionate Democratic margin made a serious difference, as did their hard work on the ground. They’re not the ones who need Geritol.

The same commentators who dismissed every conceivable American demographic as racist, lazy or both got Sarah Palin wrong too. When she made her debut in St. Paul, the punditocracy was nearly uniform in declaring her selection a brilliant coup. There hadn’t been so much instant over-the-top praise by the press for a cynical political stunt since President Bush “landed” a jet on the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln in that short-lived triumph “Mission Accomplished.”

The rave reviews for Palin were completely disingenuous. Anyone paying attention (with the possible exception of John McCain) could see she was woefully ill-equipped to serve half-a-heartbeat away from the presidency. The conservatives Peggy Noonan and Mike Murphy said so on MSNBC when they didn’t know their mikes were on. But, hey, she was a dazzling TV presence, the thinking went, so surely doltish Americans would rally around her anyway. “She killed!” cheered Noonan about the vice-presidential debate, revising her opinion upward and marveling at Palin’s gift for talking “over the heads of the media straight to the people.” Many talking heads thought she tied or beat Joe Biden.

The people, however, were reaching a less charitable conclusion and were well ahead of the Beltway curve in fleeing Palin. Only after polls confirmed that she was costing McCain votes did conventional wisdom in Washington finally change, demoting her from Republican savior to scapegoat overnight.

But Palin’s appeal wasn’t overestimated only because of her kitschy “American Idol” star quality. Her fierce embrace of the old Karl Rove wedge politics, the divisive pitting of the “real America” against the secular “other” America, was also regarded as a sure-fire winner. The second most persistent assumption by both pundits and the McCain campaign this year — after the likely triumph of racism — was that the culture war battlegrounds from 2000 and 2004 would remain intact.

This is true in exactly one instance: gay civil rights. Though Rove’s promised “permanent Republican majority” lies in humiliating ruins, his and Bush’s one secure legacy will be their demagogic exploitation of homophobia. The success of the four state initiatives banning either same-sex marriage or same-sex adoptions was the sole retro trend on Tuesday. And Obama, who largely soft-pedaled the issue this year, was little help. In California, where other races split more or less evenly on a same-sex marriage ban, some 70 percent of black voters contributed to its narrow victory.

That lagging indicator aside, nearly every other result on Tuesday suggests that while the right wants to keep fighting the old boomer culture wars, no one else does. Three state initiatives restricting abortion failed. Bill Ayers proved a lame villain, scaring no one. Americans do not want to revisit Vietnam (including in Iraq). For all the attention paid by the news media and McCain-Palin to rancorous remembrances of things past, I sometimes wondered whether most Americans thought the Weather Underground was a reunion band and the Hanoi Hilton a chain hotel. Socialism, the evil empire and even Ronald Reagan may be half-forgotten blurs too.

If there were any doubts the 1960s are over, they were put to rest Tuesday night when our new first family won the hearts of the world as it emerged on that vast blue stage to join the celebration in Chicago’s Grant Park. The bloody skirmishes that took place on that same spot during the Democratic convention 40 years ago — young vs. old, students vs. cops, white vs. black — seemed as remote as the moon. This is another America — hardly a perfect or prejudice-free America, but a union that can change and does, aspiring to perfection even if it can never achieve it.

Still, change may come slowly to the undying myths bequeathed to us by the Bush decade. “Don’t think for a minute that power concedes,” Obama is fond of saying. Neither does groupthink. We now keep hearing, for instance, that America is “a center-right nation” — apparently because the percentages of Americans who call themselves conservative (34), moderate (44) and liberal (22) remain virtually unchanged from four years ago. But if we’ve learned anything this year, surely it’s that labels are overrated. Those same polls find that more and more self-described conservatives no longer consider themselves Republicans. Americans now say they favor government doing more (51 percent), not less (43) — an 11-point swing since 2004 — and they still overwhelmingly reject the Iraq war. That’s a centrist country tilting center-left, and that’s the majority who voted for Obama.

The post-Bush-Rove Republican Party is in the minority because it has driven away women, the young, suburbanites, black Americans, Latino-Americans, Asian-Americans, educated Americans, gay Americans and, increasingly, working-class Americans. Who’s left? The only states where the G.O.P. increased its percentage of the presidential vote relative to the Democrats were West Virginia, Tennessee, Louisiana and Arkansas. Even the North Carolina county where Palin expressed her delight at being in the “real America” went for Obama by more than 18 percentage points.

The actual real America is everywhere. It is the America that has been in shell shock since the aftermath of 9/11, when our government wielded a brutal attack by terrorists as a club to ratchet up our fears, betray our deepest constitutional values and turn Americans against one another in the name of “patriotism.” What we started to remember the morning after Election Day was what we had forgotten over the past eight years, as our abusive relationship with the Bush administration and its press enablers dragged on: That’s not who we are.

So even as we celebrated our first black president, we looked around and rediscovered the nation that had elected him. “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for,” Obama said in February, and indeed millions of such Americans were here all along, waiting for a leader. This was the week that they reclaimed their country.

Morning in America


By Eugene Robinson |Thursday, November 6, 2008 | Washington Post

I almost lost it Tuesday night when television cameras found the Rev. Jesse Jackson in the crowd at Chicago's Grant Park and I saw the tears streaming down his face. His brio and bluster were gone, replaced by what looked like awestruck humility and unrestrained joy. I remembered how young he was in 1968 when he stood on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel with the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., moments before King was assassinated and hours before America's cities were set on fire.

I almost lost it again when I spoke with Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), one of the bravest leaders of the civil rights crusade, and asked whether he had ever dreamed he would live to see this day. As Lewis looked for words beyond "unimaginable," I thought of the beating he received on the Edmund Pettus Bridge and the scars his body still bears.

I did lose it, minutes before the television networks projected that Barack Obama would be the 44th president of the United States, when I called my parents in Orangeburg, S.C. I thought of the sacrifices they made and the struggles they endured so that my generation could climb higher. I felt so happy that they were here to savor this incredible moment.

I scraped myself back together, but then almost lost it again when I saw Obama standing there on the stage with his family -- wife Michelle, daughters Malia and Sasha, their outfits all color-coordinated in red and black. I thought of the mind-blowing imagery we will see when this young, beautiful black family becomes the nation's First Family.

Then, when Michelle's mother, brother and extended family came out, I thought about "the black family" as an institution -- how troubled it is, but also how resilient and how vital. And I found myself getting misty-eyed again when Barack and Michelle walked off the stage together, clinging to one another, partners about to embark on an adventure, full of possibility and peril, that will change this nation forever.

It's safe to say that I've never had such a deeply emotional reaction to a presidential election. I've found it hard to describe, though, just what it is that I'm feeling so strongly.

It's obvious that the power of this moment isn't something that only African Americans feel. When President Bush spoke about the election yesterday, he mentioned the important message that Americans will send to the world, and to themselves, when the Obama family moves into the White House.

For African Americans, though, this is personal.

I can't help but experience Obama's election as a gesture of recognition and acceptance -- which is patently absurd, if you think about it. The labor of black people made this great nation possible. Black people planted and tended the tobacco, indigo and cotton on which America's first great fortunes were built. Black people fought and died in every one of the nation's wars. Black people fought and died to secure our fundamental rights under the Constitution. We don't have to ask for anything from anybody.

Yet something changed on Tuesday when Americans -- white, black, Latino, Asian -- entrusted a black man with the power and responsibility of the presidency. I always meant it when I said the Pledge of Allegiance in school. I always meant it when I sang the national anthem at ball games and shot off fireworks on the Fourth of July. But now there's more meaning in my expressions of patriotism, because there's more meaning in the stirring ideals that the pledge and the anthem and the fireworks represent.

It's not that I would have felt less love of country if voters had chosen John McCain. And this reaction I'm trying to describe isn't really about Obama's policies. I'll disagree with some of his decisions, I'll consider some of his public statements mere double talk and I'll criticize his questionable appointments. My job will be to hold him accountable, just like any president, and I intend to do my job.

For me, the emotion of this moment has less to do with Obama than with the nation. Now I know how some people must have felt when they heard Ronald Reagan say "it's morning again in America." The new sunshine feels warm on my face.

November 6, 2008

Reflections on the election of Barack Obama by a seventy-six year old Presbyterian minister.

My telephone rang just minutes after Barack Obama was elected the next President of the United States of America. On the line was my best Turkish friend, Ramazan Arkan from Antalya, Turkey. He called to congratulate me on the election of Barack Obama.

We talked for just a few minutes, exchanging thoughts on this extraordinary historical moment. Only after hanging up did the words I spoke to Ramazan really hit me ... “I am so proud to be an American.” I turned to my wife and said, “I can’t believe what I just said! I'm proud to be an American!”

I'm a loyal and patriotic American, but it had been 39 years since I'd spoken those words.

I lost my pride in America sometime during the mid-60’s when I faced the fact that my country was fighting a war in a foreign country that never invaded us, nor threatened our national security. During the following years, my country devastated a rural agricultural nation, killed more than one million of its peasant farmers and their families, all in the name of 'saving the world for Democracy.' The years have now rolled by, and today, while the same political forces govern Vietnam—a country that is still not democratic—Vietnam is now one of America's more important trading partners in Asia.

The United States has NEVER officially owned its actions in Vietnam, or apologized for embracing the foolish 'domino theory' that was responsible for inflicting massive suffering on human beings who were never our enemies, killing over 50,000 of American young men and women - then sending our troops home in disgrace, and institutionalizing a system of post-war veteran care that damned our wounded to become a permanent nomadic city of homeless wandering the streets of America.

Now we have turned the very same polices on the people of Iraq, and the brave troops of the United States military.

Last night, I took great pride in the collective political will of the American people to shake the foundations of history - electing Barack Obama to be the 44th President of the United States. I took great pride that the American people chose a new vision for America’s future, and a new role in the world by voting for a leader committed to manifest a spirit of humility, listen to, rather than lecture the nations of the world.

But my new-found hope for the future does not rest just in the election of one single man, political party, but in a nation that now embraces the judgment and political will to join with President Obama as he forges new alliances and blazes new trails, attempting to exercise American power within the 'letter AND spirit of our great American Constitution - providing leadership that reflects the old biblical adage "not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit.”

This new historic opportunity now rests on our shoulders - all Americans - and begins with an old and new cry, heard from 'sea to shining sea' ...

I'M PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!

Art Beals. Regional Liaison
Albania, Azerbaijan, Turkey & The Balkans,
Presbyterian Church (USA)

Obama: the World Celebrates!