October 30, 2008

Barack Obama discusses the future of America with NBC's Brian Williams

Former Republican National Convention Delegate from New Hampshire switches support from McCain to Obama!

Bramante endorses Obama

A former co-chair of Mike Huckabee’s New Hampshire campaign has endorsed Barack Obama’s presidential campaign.

Fred Bramante announced on a conference call with reporters that he is backing Obama because he opposes John McCain’s plan to use school vouchers.

“I can’t live with that, I can’t be out there advocating for a candidate who I believe is going to have the center piece of his education plan an issue that I have opposed,” Bramante told reporters.

Bramante also said that he notified former Gov. Craig Benson about his decision last night.

“I had a conversation with Governor Benson, I wanted to give him a heads-up about what I was doing and he said, ‘Fred you’re putting the kids before the party and I applaud you for doing it,’” Bramante said.

Bramante stressed that he is not switching his party affiliation and still intends to vote for Republicans down-the-ballot.

“I don’t want anybody to take this that I’m becoming a Democrat that is not my intention,” Bramante said.

Bramante is also a former chairman of the state Board of Education and was an alternate delegate to the Republican National Convention in St. Paul.

BRIAN LAWSON is a PolitickerNH.com Reporter and can be reached via email at brian.lawson@politickernh.com.

'American Stories, American Solutions' - Barack Obama's closing message to the American people

Bill Clinton stumps with Barack Obama in Florida


Barack Obama on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

Commentary - A Conservative For Obama


Ron Wilcox 10.30.08

I'm a conservative. I've spent my money and my time in support of Republican candidates. I also support Barack Obama for president.

Modern conservatism is deeply rooted in ideas and political philosophy, in rational discourse and pragmatism. John Stuart Mill matters to conservatives. Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman matter as well. They matter not only because of their conclusions about the limited role of government power in a free society but because they were aggressive questioners, carefully dissecting problems to uncover potential solutions.

The American version of modern conservatism began as an intellectual revolt against the excesses of government emerging out of the New Deal era. The prevailing liberal view of the time was that government could engineer a more just and equitable society by elevating its role in the day-to-day activities of citizens. Proponents believed the benefits of collective decision making outweighed the increased restrictions on individuals' liberties that such social engineering required.

The modern conservative movement, through rational discourse and appeals to empirical research in economics, pointed out that reducing these individual freedoms had negative consequences far in excess of the commonly held view. Yes, you could decrease poverty among low-wage workers by mandating a minimum wage, but you would also increase unemployment among the young and those of color. Yes, you could use the power of taxation to redistribute income, but this could dramatically shrink the wealth available to the entire society.

Conservatives used to ask the tough questions and did not accept simplistic solutions. That is why it is deeply disappointing to me, both personally and professionally, that John McCain has run a campaign that is so antithetical to rational discourse about public policy. His campaign has been about glib answers to complex problems. His choice for vice president was political malpractice.

He has catered to a wing of the Republican Party that believes everything will be all right--if only the government gets out of the way. No matter the problem, that is the only acceptable solution. To suggest that research about or thoughtful analysis of a situation might, in some cases, point in a different direction is apostasy.

For these Republicans, simply the act of doing policy analysis must mean that you are a liberal. They know that real Republicans, and real men, don't need to think things through. I do not respect these people. They have dragged a proud movement that had much to offer our country down into the mud of ignorance.

And yet the reason I now support Obama is only partially due to McCain's decision to embrace this base form of populism. It also stems from a growing respect for Obama's thoughtfulness, which reveals itself when he's faced with difficult questions. I do not agree with all elements of Obama's tax policy, but I certainly get the impression he has thought about it a whole lot more than McCain.

In a world that will certainly throw many unexpected, unknowable problems at the next president, I don't really care if I agree with all of their policy decisions. I want a smart, thoughtful person who can adapt his ideas to the facts on the ground. I don't want someone who retreats to ideology because he cannot--or is not inclined to--think through the complexities of the problem at hand. Barack Obama is not afraid to talk about complicated solutions to complicated problems. He is a skilled critical thinker. John McCain, unfortunately, has not left the same impression on me.

I also believe that Obama will not end up being the orthodox liberal many have warned against or hoped for. He is not from Cambridge, Mass. He is from Illinois. His economic advisers, both formal and some informal, are from the University of Chicago, a school known for its free market philosophy; he also taught there.

The institutions with which you associate, after all, do affect your thinking. That life experience, combined with his inquisitive mind, will lead him out of the liberal underbrush when the House of Representatives inevitably proposes some hard-left legislation. I genuinely believe the people who are likely to be most disappointed with Obama are the far left wing of the Democratic Party.

I will not celebrate when Obama is elected president next Tuesday, but I will smile a little--and hope that my beliefs about him are correct.

Ronald T. Wilcox is a Darden School professor of business administration at the University of Virginia and author of Whatever Happened to Thrift? Why Americans Don't Save and What to Do About It. This piece is adapted from a post on his blog

October 29, 2008

"We can choose hope over fear...and once more, choose our better history"

This is perhaps the most important speech Barack Obama has delivered to date - tying together the themes of hope and possibility - calling to the 'better angels' of our nature.

Please send this along to everyone you know - zjm

Olbermann on Palin: 'Socialist and Fraud'

"His Choice"

Barack Obama's newest ad on John McCain's lack of presidential judgement and leadership - pass along to everyone you know -

zjm

A nation falls in love, once more


by Lisa Van Dusen | Wednesday, 29 October, 2008

A friend sent me a link the other night to a video called Bridges for Obama, a montage of Obama supporters on different bridges around the world, set to an R&B anthem written for the candidate.

Watching these people in Cairo and Cambridge and Vancouver, it was hard not to feel for John McCain, ending his career as this guy's opponent; a fate that could actually wear worse on him if he somehow squeaks out an upset than if he loses.

As the campaign careens through its final week of crackpot Marxist slurs and last-minute handgun hoarding, one of the topics of premature post-game analysis is pro-Obama media bias.

(My disclosure: I volunteered for the Obama campaign before starting this column.)

For civilians, there are politicians you vote for and there are politicians you 'fall in love with' (in American terms, both John and Robert Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan).

Given the right, rare confluence of talent, ability and history, journalists aren't immune to those distinctions.

Falling in political love isn't like falling in the other kind, though they can both represent a triumph of hope over experience; a process even more discombobulating for people who start out necessarily cynical and hard to impress.

In Thurston Clarke's book about Bobby Kennedy's fateful bid for the Democratic nomination in 1968, The Last Campaign, Tom Wicker of the New York Times called Kennedy, 'an easy man to fall in love with, and too many people did.'

Richard Harwood of the Washington Post asked to be taken off the Kennedy campaign because, he told his editors, "I'm falling in love with the guy" and could no longer be objective.

Political reporters develop a herculean tolerance for BS based on prolonged exposure. Otherwise, they couldn't do the job.

But once in a very long while, someone takes the stage (that's the polit-love version of a Barry Manilow opening) who jerks us out of that blah-blah-blah reverie, to quote John McCain.

It could be that some of the best journalists in the United States at the time fell in love with Bobby Kennedy because his role in the Shakespearean tightrope act of fulfilling his brother's destiny without repeating it, defied objectivity in the same way Obama's promise as the first African-American and first post 9/11 president does now.

Maybe he also had more in common with reporters than Lyndon Johnson or Richard Nixon or Hubert Humphrey.

Obama, too, seems like a guy who might have been a journalist if he hadn't been so smart.

In Clarke's account of that last campaign, he quotes Life magazine columnist Loudon Wainwright describing a more visceral source of bias on the Kennedy bus: Protectiveness.

The reporters, wrote Wainwright, were 'concerned to the point of anxiety about his safety.'

If one gut check for bias is being too invested in an outcome, you can see how stakes like those might shift the calculus.

Obama's run has shifted the usual protocols to the point where Republicans are now scrambling to endorse him.

In fact, in a different scenario, it wouldn't be hard to imagine McCain, the anti-Republican Republican, doing the same.

October 27, 2008

Vote Obama ... for the future of America: A video letter from Opie, Andy, and the Fonz

See more Ron Howard videos at Funny or Die

Eight days to go - time to step up our efforts!

Didn't think the thought of Sarah Palin anywhere near the White House could get more horrifying?

From
Palin said Saturday she was 'annoyed' with Couric after her interview.
Palin said Saturday she was 'annoyed' with Couric after her interview.

FORT WAYNE, Indiana (CNN) Campaigning Saturday in Fort Wayne, Indiana, a city once represented in Congress by another vice presidential candidate named Dan Quayle, Sarah Palin delivered one of her longest stump speeches to date and revealed that she was “annoyed” with the line of questioning presented by Katie Couric in her now-infamous interview with CBS.

Palin reprised a story she last told a week ago in Noblesville, Indiana about her sit-down with Couric, which was widely panned.

“Last time I was here I got to tell a crowd that I had to give a national interview that didn’t go so well,” she said. “And it was because I was kind of annoyed with the questions that I was being asked because I thought they were kind of irrelevant to, you know, national security issues and getting our economy back on track, so I kind of showed some of that annoyance.”

Couric did, in fact, ask Palin several questions about the economy and national security, focusing in particular on the congressional bailout package, the mortgage crisis, John McCain’s record on regulation, the war in Afghanistan, hunting terrorists in Pakistan, Russia, Iran, Syria, Israel and the role of the United States in the world.

Palin joked, however, about another line of questioning.

“But I think the one question that I answered that everyone could agree on, it maybe shows where my heart is… too is, she asked me this relevant question: What was my favorite movie? And I said ‘Hoosiers!’”

October 26, 2008

Over 100,000 listen to Barack Obama take on John McCain in Denver!



More than 35 newspapers endorse Obama today!


Editor&Publisher described this morning's newspaper endorsements as "a landslide for Obama." Some of the highlights include:

Iowa - Des Moines Register:

An Obama presidency presents the best hope for a unified America that aspires to greatness again.

iowa - Quad City Times:

Already, Obama is demonstrating presidential leadership and demeanor, displaying steely calm against an avalanche of unfair attacks, distortions and distractions.

Florida - Gainesville Sun:

Obama has, through the power of his rhetoric and reason, captured the imagination of millions of Americans who have little interest in politics-as-usual.

Louisiana - Times-Picayune:

We believe that Barack Obama could help restore our reputation as a land of opportunity. But that benefit is dwarfed by a larger potential that we think an Obama presidency could achieve: Seizing the chance for America to lead and, at a time of crisis and transformation, be a global pioneer.

Pennsylvania - Wilkes-Barre Times Leader:

But Obama’s composure – combined with his intelligence, ideas, communication skills and capacity to rally people to a cause – gave our endorsement board the evidence it needed to reach a decision: Democrat Barack Obama is the man for the job.

Pennsylvania - Pocono Record:

Obama's early opposition to the war attracted his initial supporters. Since then his steady, measured, intelligent approach to a wide range of issues has drawn millions more, including many well-known Republicans, to his campaign.

Virginia - Staunton News Leader:

Obama brings a freshness, good ideas and, above all, the confidence that we will be led by an administration that will restore a better life for Americans, trust among the nations of the world and decisions made with all of us in mind, not just the upper class.

Other newspapers endorsing Barack today included the Coloradoan, the Vail Daily, the Pensacola News Journal, the Bloomington Pantagraph, the Decatur Herald & Review, the Southtown Star, the Billings Gazette, the Keene Sentinel, the Valley News, the Cherry Hill Courier Post, the Pottstown Mercury, the Patriot News, the Beaver County Times, the Delware County Times, the Times West Virginian and more.

In all, over 35 newspapers endorsed Barack Obama today, bringing the current total number of endorsements to over 173.

Anchorage Daily News Endorses Obama: 'On the most important issue of the day, Sen. Obama is a clear choice.'


Obama for president

Palin's rise captivates us but nation needs a steady hand

Alaska enters its 50th-anniversary year in the glow of an improbable and highly memorable event: the nomination of Gov. Sarah Palin as the Republican vice presidential candidate. For the first time ever, an Alaskan is making a serious bid for national office, and in doing so she brings broad attention and recognition not only to herself, but also to the state she leads.

Alaska's founders were optimistic people, but even the most farsighted might have been stretched to imagine this scenario. No matter the outcome in November, this election will mark a signal moment in the history of the 49th state. Many Alaskans are proud to see their governor, and their state, so prominent on the national stage.

Gov. Palin's nomination clearly alters the landscape for Alaskans as we survey this race for the presidency -- but it does not overwhelm all other judgment. The election, after all is said and done, is not about Sarah Palin, and our sober view is that her running mate, Sen. John McCain, is the wrong choice for president at this critical time for our nation.

Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee, brings far more promise to the office. In a time of grave economic crisis, he displays thoughtful analysis, enlists wise counsel and operates with a cool, steady hand. The same cannot be said of Sen. McCain.

Since his early acknowledgement that economic policy is not his strong suit, Sen. McCain has stumbled and fumbled badly in dealing with the accelerating crisis as it emerged. He declared that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong" at 9 a.m. one day and by 11 a.m. was describing an economy in crisis. He is both a longtime advocate of less market regulation and a supporter of the huge taxpayer-funded Wall Street bailout. His behavior in this crisis -- erratic is a kind description -- shows him to be ill-equipped to lead the essential effort of reining in a runaway financial system and setting an anxious nation on course to economic recovery.

Sen. Obama warned regulators and the nation 19 months ago that the subprime lending crisis was a disaster in the making. Sen. McCain backed tighter rules for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but didn't do much to advance that legislation. Of the two candidates, Sen. Obama better understands the mortgage meltdown's root causes and has the judgment and intelligence to shape a solution, as well as the leadership to rally the country behind it. It is easy to look at Sen. Obama and see a return to the smart, bipartisan economic policies of the last Democratic administration in Washington, which left the country with the momentum of growth and a budget surplus that President George Bush has squandered.

On the most important issue of the day, Sen. Obama is a clear choice.

Sen. McCain describes himself as a maverick, by which he seems to mean that he spent 25 years trying unsuccessfully to persuade his own party to follow his bipartisan, centrist lead. Sadly, maverick John McCain didn't show up for the campaign. Instead we have candidate McCain, who embraces the extreme Republican orthodoxy he once resisted and cynically asks Americans to buy for another four years.

It is Sen. Obama who truly promises fundamental change in Washington. You need look no further than the guilt-by-association lies and sound-bite distortions of the degenerating McCain campaign to see how readily he embraces the divisive, fear-mongering tactics of Karl Rove. And while Sen. McCain points to the fragile success of the troop surge in stabilizing conditions in Iraq, it is also plain that he was fundamentally wrong about the more crucial early decisions. Contrary to his assurances, we were not greeted as liberators; it was not a short, easy war; and Americans -- not Iraqi oil -- have had to pay for it. It was Sen. Obama who more clearly saw the danger ahead.

The unqualified endorsement of Sen. Obama by a seasoned, respected soldier and diplomat like Gen. Colin Powell, a Republican icon, should reassure all Americans that the Democratic candidate will pass muster as commander in chief.

On a matter of parochial interest, Sen. Obama opposes the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, but so does Sen. McCain. We think both are wrong, and hope a President Obama can be convinced to support environmentally responsible development of that resource.

Gov. Palin has shown the country why she has been so successful in her young political career. Passionate, charismatic and indefatigable, she draws huge crowds and sows excitement in her wake. She has made it clear she's a force to be reckoned with, and you can be sure politicians and political professionals across the country have taken note. Her future, in Alaska and on the national stage, seems certain to be played out in the limelight.

Yet despite her formidable gifts, few who have worked closely with the governor would argue she is truly ready to assume command of the most important, powerful nation on earth. To step in and juggle the demands of an economic meltdown, two deadly wars and a deteriorating climate crisis would stretch the governor beyond her range. Like picking Sen. McCain for president, putting her one 72-year-old heartbeat from the leadership of the free world is just too risky at this time.

More Palin corruption and sketchy ethics...

Bidding process for Palin's pipeline was flawed

updated 5:51 p.m. ET, Sat., Oct. 25, 2008

ANCHORAGE, Alaska - Gov. Sarah Palin's signature accomplishment — a contract to build a 1,715-mile pipeline to bring natural gas from Alaska to the Lower 48 — emerged from a flawed bidding process that narrowed the field to a company with ties to her administration, an Associated Press investigation shows. (Read the entire story here)

Issues, solutions trump race in U.S. election


by Lisa Van Dusen/10.26.08

On the evening of last Jan. 26 at the Columbia, S.C., Convention Center, something happened in the middle of Barack Obama's victory speech.

Obama had beaten Hillary Clinton 55%-27% in that day's primary, results that were seen at least in part as a referendum on the issue of race, especially among whites, a quarter of whom voted for Obama.

"We have the most votes the most delegates and the most diverse coalition of Americans that we've seen in a long, long time," Obama said.

From the bleachers behind him, a new chant erupted.

"Race doesn't matter! Race doesn't matter!"

It was an admonishment to the other side and a dare to the rest of the country.

In the past two weeks, the rest of the country seems to have responded. Obama is now at least ten points ahead in most polls. More crucially, especially for the question of whether America was ready for a black president, 48 percent now say they have confidence in Obama serving as commander in chief, statistically even with McCain's 50 percent, and seven out of 10 now say race won't be a factor in their vote.

Those numbers have shifted in the past six weeks, as Obama has passed every leadership test McCain has failed, from his choice of running mate to his handling of the economy to his daily campaign decisions (at a certain point, momentum becomes its own leadership indicator).

After months of uncertainty about whether there was a ceiling beyond which racial attitudes would limit his support, the issue has been clarified by both voters' economic concerns and Obama's obvious strengths.

Obama is now leading in states such as Indiana and Virginia that have not voted for a Democratic presidential candidate since Lyndon Johnson's landslide against Barry Goldwater in 1964, when the demographic divisions over his newly passed Civil Rights Act hadn't yet gelled and the nation was still mourning president Kennedy.

ACCOMPLISHMENT

No matter what happens in the next nine days, the success of their 50-state strategy is an accomplishment that not just Obama but his Chicago strategists won't have to tell their grandchildren about because they'll learn it in civics class.

What they may also learn is that, in this election, the path from voter intention to ballot to official result was especially daunting.

The 2000 Florida recounts exposed more about the sausage-making details of democracy than just chads and hanging chads, it revealed the extent to which voter suppression had become the new black art of political warfare and it's only grown more sophisticated since then.

Since Congress passed the misleadingly named Help America Vote Act in 2002, partisan election officials have purged, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, more than 2.7 million voters from the rolls. In 2004, more than 1.6 million votes were never counted.

Environmental lawyer and Democratic activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose birthright must give him an acute appreciation for the lengths to which people will go to subvert democracy, founded the website NoVoterLeftBehind.net partly to substantiate to the conventional wisdom that the law disproportionately impacts Democratic voters.

"HAVA has been used to erect a series of barriers," Kennedy told MSNBC last week, "that make it really an obstacle course, particularly for African Americans to vote, for Hispanics to vote, for young people and old people."

The new registration requirements, in the finest tradition of racially and politically skewed motor voter laws, use prohibitively stringent ID requirements, including driver's licence requirements and "perfect match" rules that require every fact on all your government IDs to match when you register to vote.

BRADLEY EFFECT

Most years, a huge gap between pre-vote polling, exit poll results and official tallies would raise questions. But because of the speculation about the Bradley effect, whereby the black mayor of Los Angeles lost his bid for the California governorship 26 years ago after polls showed him ahead, the outcome some people envision when they say "narrow victory scenario" holds more than a faint hope.

When voters have cited issues other than race in their intention not to vote for Obama and the ones who do see race as an issue haven't been shy about it, a real Bradley effect would require an awful lot of backpedalling by an awful lot of people.

And covering suppression by selling a decades-old fable that race does matter to voters who've already said it doesn't would make what happened in Florida eight years ago look like a day at the beach.