June 7, 2008

From The New York Times: The Long Goodbye: Clinton Suspends Her Campaign and Endorses Obama

“The way to continue our fight now, to accomplish the goals for which we stand, is to take our energy, our passion and our strength and do all we can to help elect Barack Obama the next president of the United States.

“I endorse him and throw my full support behind him.”

She asks her supporters to work as hard for him as they did for her. She vouches for him, saying she had a front-row seat to his candidacy for the last 16 months and saw his strength, determination, grace and grit. “He has lived the American dream,” she says. And now, “our paths have merged.”

“I am standing with Senator Obama to say, ‘Yes we can,’” she says, adopting his slogan, which some of her supporters on the campaign trail had converted into a chant for her, “Yes she will!”

FINALLY ... MAYBE ... TODAY


June 5, 2008

Barack in Bristol, VA: "They do not fund my campaign. They will not fund our party."

40 Years Later, We Remember, and Listen Once Again

Ted Kennedy's Eulogy of RFK

Obama Pound

By God, For All Our Sakes, I Hope So!


Hillary Gets It Done

by Lisa Van Dusen


Hillary Clinton's decision late yesterday to suspend her campaign as of tomorrow and endorse Barack Obama did wonders to improve the prospects of the Democratic party in November.

For a moment after he proclaimed himself the presumptive Democratic nominee for president Tuesday night on a stage in St. Paul, Obama looked like he was either genuinely overcome by the moment or really, really pissed off.

Given the kind of night he was having, it could have been either one or a little of both.

Could be he was feeling a little conflicted because the opponent he had finally, indisputably defeated after a gruelingly long battle had just injected the proceedings with a definite sense of surreal, Lewis Carroll cognitive dissonance by delivering an un-concession speech so she could have more cake.

It was a great disappointment to many Democrats, including many in her own campaign, who thought that Clinton would, despite everything her behaviour had predicted up to that point, rise to the occasion.

That, in the end -- which is what it was by any sane measure -- she would say something that would remind us of a more innocent time, a time before she raised a certain kind of politics to heights previously unseen in most constitutional democracies.

But what Clinton delivered Tuesday night in New York was more of a call to arms, with a deluge of cold water thrown in for good measure.

Faced with the final, irrefutable fact of her defeat, Senator Clinton went out on that stage and delivered her stump speech, as though it was just another night on the campaign trail, only with a tribute to herself thrown in, and topped off by an appeal to the supporters she desperately wants to characterize as a critical mass-fuelled movement, to e-mail in their suggestions as to what she should do next.

There was a fleeting mention of Obama off the top, with no mention of the words won or nominee, and then onto her own plans, which in the real world would consist of a couple of weeks of dogs-up in Chappaqua followed by some targeted surrogate work for her party's historic, unexpectedly weary nominee.

But in a moment that was essentially a refutation of both the occasion and reality, both electoral and historic, Senator Clinton tastelessly raised the question of What Hillary Wants on a night when the only answer should have been "to unite the Democratic Party" and followed it by its own answer: Leverage.

Rather than displaying any of the class or generosity of spirit that the Obama campaign was squinting away at their monitors straining to hear, she commanded that leverage from the masses. Hillary Clinton put in motion an option of presenting the public and Obama with the post-Internet version of the Miracle on 34th Street courtroom mailbag scene: A claim of millions of e-mails representing an "uncontrollable" grassroots movement to either put her on the ticket or push on to a bloodbath in Denver.

She can overtake the impression she left for history and redeem Tuesday night by delivering a vastly different message tomorrow. This time, they say, she will.

28 Superdelegates Endorse Obama on Wednesday

From HQ Blog: In the wake of yesterday's historic results, a new wave of superdelegates has come forth and endorsed Barack Obama over the course of the day. Many of them took the opportunity to praise the efforts of both candidates, while expressing their support for Barack and desire for unity within the party.

Sen. Barbara Boxer (CA), Sen. Tom Harkin (IA), Sen. Ken Salazar (CO), Sen. Ron Wyden (OR), Sen. Tom Carper (DE), Sen. Frank Lautenburg (NJ), Sen. Mary Landrieu (LA) and Sen. Ben Cardin (MD) all endorsed this afternoon, issuing a joint statement that congradulated both candidates and pledged their support to Senator Obama.

As Senators who remained neutral in this contest, we are proud of Senators Obama and Clinton for breaking down barriers that some believed were unbreakable and for inspiring millions in our country to participate in our political process, many for the first time.

...Our focus now is on victory in November and on giving Barack Obama every ounce of our support, every bit of our energy, and our total commitment to do everything in our power to win the Presidency.

"Now is the time for all of us to come together. I enthusiastically support Senator Obama. He will be our nominee, and now it's very important that we all unite behind his candidacy. He has energized millions of new voters, and if we can sustain that momentum by coming together, he will be the next president of the United States."

"I've spoken with Senator Obama and made it clear that he could count me as an endorsing supporter of his at the Democratic Convention this August. Senator Obama is an effective leader, capable of leading our country into a new era, and I look forward to doing everything I can to ensure his success this November."

Other Superdelegates who endorsed Barack Obama today:

June 4, 2008

Remembering the Hope of Bobby - 40 Years Ago Today

US elections: Jimmy Carter tells Barack Obama not to pick Hillary Clinton as running mate


Jonathan Freedland | Wednesday June 4 2008

Barack Obama should not pick Hillary Clinton as his vice-presidential nominee, former president Jimmy Carter has told the Guardian.

"I think it would be the worst mistake that could be made," said Carter. "That would just accumulate the negative aspects of both candidates."

Carter, who formally endorsed the Illinois senator last night, cited opinion polls showing 50% of US voters with a negative view of Clinton.

In terms that might discomfort the Obama camp, he said: "If you take that 50% who just don't want to vote for Clinton and add it to whatever element there might be who don't think Obama is white enough or old enough or experienced enough or because he's got a middle name that sounds Arab, you could have the worst of both worlds."

Presumptive Nominee Barack Obama

Even Bush Has a Better Grasp of Reality and Civility than the Queen of Narcissism, Hillary Rodham Clinton

This morning, President Bush, appropriately, congratulated Obama through his White House spokeswoman Dana Perino:

"President Bush congratulates Sen. Obama for clinching the Democratic party's 2008 nomination for president," Perino told reporters. "He knows from personal experience that the presidential nominating process is a grueling one and Sen. Obama came a long way in becoming his party's nominee."

Even Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice got in on the act, stating that Obama's nomination is an 'extraordinary' development for the United States.

Hillary's refusal to acknowledge Barack Obama' s historic victory in the race for the Democratic Nomination is boorish at best; her refusal to congratulate him, and deal with reality, the latest evidence of her pathological narcissism (after all, it did keep her on the front pages today) and her ultimate disregard for the Democratic Party and the people of the United States.

Hil' is nothing short of a very bad joke that refuses to go away.

Worse yet, the leadership of the Democratic Party continues to salute her!

Despicable.

Please visit Obama's website and send a note of encouragement to resist the growing suicidal pressure to put HRC on the ticket.

Time to move on; time for change that does not include any of the Clintons.

zjm

June 3, 2008

From the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863 to June 3, 2008: Barack Obama, Nominee of the Democratic Party

Americans Favor President Meeting With U.S. Enemies: John McCain is Out of Touch With the American People

by Lydia Saad

PRINCETON, NJ -- Large majorities of Democrats and independents, and even about half of Republicans, believe the president of the United States should meet with the leaders of countries that are considered enemies of the United States. Overall, 67% of Americans say this kind of diplomacy is a good idea.

This is according to a Gallup Panel survey of a representative national sample of 1,013 Americans, conducted May 19-21.

Although separate Gallup polling shows that few Americans view Iran favorably, and that Iran leads Americans' list of top U.S. enemies in the world, the new Gallup survey also finds high public support for presidential-level meetings between the United States and Iran, specifically.

About 6 in 10 Americans (59%) think it would be a good idea for the president of the United States to meet with the president of Iran. This includes about half of Republicans, a majority of independents, and most Democrats.

Both positions enjoy broad popular appeal, with majorities of men, women, younger and older Americans, and those from different regions of the country all saying direct presidential-level talks with Iran and other enemies are a good idea.

The issue of using presidential diplomacy with U.S. enemies distinguishes Barack Obama from the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, John McCain, and even from his opponent for the Democratic nomination, Hillary Clinton.

Obama is the only one of the three who has said he would personally meet with the leaders of countries like Iran, Syria, Cuba, and Venezuela as president, and he recently defended his position by saying "strong countries and strong presidents talk to their adversaries." Clinton has criticized Obama's approach as "naïve," and McCain has been unrelenting in his attacks on the issue, accusing Obama of being dangerously inexperienced and having "reckless judgment."

Bottom Line

McCain may eventually persuade more Americans that there is nothing for the president of the United States to discuss with hostile foreign leaders like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and that to do so only undermines U.S. efforts to destabilize such regimes.

However, for now, whether it's the leader of an "enemy" country, generally, or the president of Iran, specifically, Americans think it's a good idea for the president of the United States to meet directly with the nation's adversaries.

President Obama

In August, Barack Obama will give his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention on the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King's 'I have a Dream' speech in Washington. In February, President Obama will lay a wreath at the Lincoln memorial on the 200th anniversary of Lincoln's birth.

This is HISTORY folks.

Time has come for the Clinton supporters to stop whining. You lost. Time to support the next President of the United States.

Time to get in step with History.

zjm