Showing posts with label Bitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bitter. Show all posts

April 21, 2008

Obama Rebounds Nationally

PRINCETON, NJ -- Support for Barack Obama's nomination bid has rebounded among national Democratic voters, who now favor him over Hillary Clinton by a seven percentage point margin, 49% to 42%
This is first time Obama has had a statistically significant advantage over Clinton since the race collapsed into a dead heat late last week. Prior to that, Obama was enjoying his longest front-runner streak since the start of Gallup Poll Daily tracking in January.

Today's results, from Gallup Poll Daily tracking conducted April 18-20, show Obama doing quite well in the last two days of polling (on Saturday and Sunday), suggesting the latest difficulties troubling his campaign -- largely stemming from the April 16 Democratic debate in Philadelphia and the ensuing media coverage-- are subsiding.

April 19, 2008

Opportunistic and Deceitful Hillary Slams the Democratic Activists in Her Own Party

The Huffington Post has published a scathing article on Hillary attacking faithful members of the Democratic Party. Addressing the same issue, OpEdNews.com stated "the New York Times has absolutely ignored it. By this time last week, the Times had written about 258 stories about Obama’s “elitist” views, as revealed in, like, 16 words in San Francisco."

After the shameful debacle of the biased ABC presidential debate this week, it is vital that all Americans look at the not so subtle workings of our media and the continuing despicable campaign tactics of Hillary Clinton.

I strongly urge you to take time to watch the MSNBC report below, and to completely read the article links I have enclosed.

This election is ultimately about the preservation of our democracy.

zjm

April 18, 2008

Hillary Drops Back: A New Newsweek Poll Shows Obama Pulling Away.


By Michael Hirsh | Newsweek Web Exclusive Apr 18, 2008

Despite her campaign's relentless attacks on Barack Obama's qualifications and electability, Hillary Clinton has lost a lot of ground with Democratic voters nationwide going into Tuesday's critical primary in Pennsylvania, a new NEWSWEEK poll shows. The survey of 1,209 registered voters found that Obama now leads Clinton by nearly 20 points, or 54 percent to 35 percent, among registered Democrats and those who lean Democratic nationwide.

Winning Pennsylvania



by Dylan Loewe | Posted April 18, 2008


After what has seemed like an interminable campaign purgatory, the Pennsylvania primary is finally only four days away. Despite suggestion to the contrary, Barack Obama is all but guaranteed a victory.

Obama may well pull an upset. Since Texas and Ohio, the Clinton campaign has focused their message primarily on a superdelegate strategy. That strategy has included arguing that Obama
is unelectable, suggesting he is out-of-touch and elitist, and criticizing him repeatedly for innocent associations with guilty people. The problem of course is that her argument to the superdelegates is not the most advisable to pitch to Democratic primary voters. It is not a coincidence that she sounds awfully similar to John McCain when she speaks. The rationale for her receiving the nomination without earning it is premised on the notion that Obama would not be able to stand up to Republican attacks. As such, she has peppered him with those attacks.

But such attacks are distinctly Republican for a reason, namely that they resonate significantly better with the Republican base than with Democrats. The left is unlikely to be swayed by Reverend Wright or Bill Ayers, and unlikely to find something especially disturbing about comments made at a San Francisco fundraiser. They are, after all, Democrats. It is not surprising, then, that we have seen no decline in Obama's poll numbers among those voters currently in play.

It is not just the attacks themselves that have failed, but also the act and manner in which they have been carried out. For at least a month now, the accepted media narrative is that Hillary's likelihood of winning is incredibly slim and that, absent something unforeseeable, Barack Obama will prevail. Even among those still undecided, watching Hillary Clinton beating up on the likely Democratic nominee is unsettling. Polls have consistently shown her negatives shooting up. More than half of Democrats say they don't trust her.

Of course, despite all of this, Hillary still leads in the state, and may pull off a win. A win for her, however, is still a significant victory for Obama. Despite having broken all campaign spending records in the state and despite having dramatically cut Hillary Clinton's lead, the narrative has yet to change. It is still the case that the Clinton campaign and surrogates are predicting a substantial victory. It is still the case that most pundits and opinion makers have come to expect one, as well. And with Obama's subpar debate performance and two mini-crises boiling to the surface in the final days of the campaign, it would appear expectations for Obama are nearly impossibly low. To meet or exceed those expectations would require almost nothing at all.

But whether those expectations are exceeded with a five point loss or met with a double-digit defeat, that Pennsylvania is over means the clouds of uncertainty that engulf the race will begin to clear. There is, indeed, a new kind of inevitability on the horizon. Whether he wins on Tuesday or not, Barack Obama cannot lose.

Formerly the Executive Director of Ballotground, a multi-state anti-war ballot initiative campaign, Dylan Loewe is the editor of Loewe Political Report and an op-ed contributor for The Guardian. He is currently pursuing a Masters in Public Policy from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and a law degree from Columbia Law School.

Pittsburgh Grandmother Sees Hope in Obama's Candidacy


60-year-old 'idealist' drawn to candidate and his stance on war, global warming

Friday, April 18, 2008 | By Robert Dvorchak, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

STRASBURG, Pa. -- After leaving her day job, Joyce Akins switches gears to volunteer on a political campaign -- knocking on doors, working the phones or pitching in.

No 60-year-old grandmother would make that kind of a commitment unless she was passionate about doing her part. And as an example of her firm beliefs in who would make the better president, she displays a 12-foot-wide banner on her barn in support of Sen. Barack Obama.

The barn sits smack in the middle of the Republican stronghold of Lancaster County. In her mind, a campaign button or a mere bumper sticker just wouldn't do.

"I thought I had to do it," said Mrs. Akins. "The Democratic headquarters here is so far off the beaten path it's called The Underground, so I had to think outside of the box and take a stand. He's the right person. He offers hope that our children and grandchildren can have a better future."

With the redwood barn sitting just off a rural road that routinely produces the clip-clop sound of horses pulling Amish buggies, the blue banner does attract attention. But not all of the reaction is favorable.

"Oh, I knew what was coming," she said. "I've had some yard signs ripped. I've been yelled at, and some people will shout profanity. But some have stopped to say thanks for having the courage of your convictions, and I think, what courage? For exercising my right to state my political preference? What America am I living in?"

Mrs. Akins hasn't just gotten involved in the Pennsylvania primary. She worked previously as an Obama volunteer in Delaware, Maryland, Virginia and New Jersey.

"It was so cold in Delaware the ink froze in our pens," she recalled.

After her regular workday as an administrative assistant at a school that helps teach dyslexic children, she starts campaigning on the most elementary of levels. If she's at Obama headquarters, there are usually about 50 fellow volunteers with cell phones and laptops, some of them from out of state and living off late night pizza and donated rooms.

Just last week, Mrs. Akins received a shipment of campaign pins from a woman in Illinois who founded the Sisters of the Buttonhood. Each button she passes out identifies the wearer as "Another Middle-Aged White Woman For Obama."

The roots of her activism go back to the days when John F. Kennedy appealed to a new generation of Americans to ask what they could do for their country.

"I was too young to vote for him, but he called us to get involved, and I heard the call," said Mrs. Akins, who grew up in Latrobe and attended Greensburg Central Catholic High School and Edinboro University of Pennsylvania. "America is an ideal, so I guess that makes me an idealist. I'm a dreamer."

And she developed a rebellious streak early on.

"My father raised me to question authority," she said.

For all of the self-indulgence and wretched excess, the '60s were a time of social and political upheaval, marked by assassinations, race riots, campus unrest, environmental awareness and equal rights. The music of the day carried messages -- We shall overcome. ... The answer is blowin' in the wind. ... Stand. ... We can change the world.

"Music was important to us. It united us in many ways," said Mrs. Akins, who still has vinyl albums by Pete Seeger, Joan Baez and other troubadours in her record collection.

While the message has been adapted to the campaign slogan of "Change We Can Believe In," Mrs. Akins wishes more baby boomers would show some of the old activism.

"A lot of them sold out," she said. "Most of my friends have second homes and drive a Mercedes. They did really well."

Mrs. Akins once marched against the Vietnam War carrying her son in her womb. Now, with the future of her 3-year-old grandson on her mind, she marches with Cindy Sheehan against the war without end in Iraq.

She also participated in the first Earth Day in 1970. Now she supports Mr. Obama in part because of his views on global warming. She once drove a Volkswagen. Now she has a Toyota Prius hybrid.

"I can remember being told on that first Earth Day that we'd be doing the same work at the turn of the century, and my heart sank. But here it is 2008 and we're still working to respect the environment," she said.

In many ways, Mrs. Akins still marches to the beat of a different drummer.

"I would love to be able to vote for a woman, but I don't think you should vote because of someone's gender. That's not the way to choose a president," she said. "I don't trust Hillary. I think it would be Bush Lite. I can't vote for her. She voted for the war in Iraq. We need a change. We need someone who can unite us and bring people together."

Barack Obama wasn't her first choice. She liked the candor of Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich, but when his campaign ended, she was drawn to the message of change delivered with inspirational oratory.

"He empowers people," Mrs. Akins said. "He's inspired a new generation. I have a good life, but what about people who aren't as fortunate? There's so much hope, but there's also a great deal of fear."

She's not alone in her volunteer efforts. Her husband switched his voter registration from Republican to Democrat to vote in Tuesday's primary. Her son changed from independent to do the same thing. And her daughter does volunteer work with her.

But there are sacrifices, such as those times when she comes home late at night to hear a voice message left by her grandson: "Oh, you must be at Obama's."

"I know the country is at the precipice," Mrs. Akins said. "Change is not going to come easily, and we're all going to have to bite the bullet. But nothing is more important. Our grandchildren's future depends on it."

Obama on Colbert Report: "Political Distractions - You Are Officially On Notice!"

April 17, 2008

Question to Obama: "What is your strategy to beat the Republicans in November"

Mayor Richard Daley (the younger) comes to Barack Obama's defense


April 17, 2008Ayers

Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, whose father and namesake was famously not so sympathetic to antiwar protesters, is coming to the defense of Barack Obama for his link to former Weather Underground member Bill Ayers.

Daley accused Hillary Clinton and other critics of Obama's association with Ayers of "re-fighting 40-year-old battles." And the mayor noted that he also knows Ayers and has "worked with" him on city education reforms.

The mayor released the following statement:

"There are a lot of reasons that Americans are angry about Washington politics. And one more example is the way Senator Obama's opponents are playing guilt-by-association, tarring him because he happens to know Bill Ayers.

I also know Bill Ayers. He worked with me in shaping our now nationally-renowned school reform program. He is a nationally-recognized distinguished professor of education at the University of Illinois/Chicago and a valued member of the Chicago community.

I don't condone what he did 40 years ago but I remember that period well. It was a difficult time, but those days are long over. I believe we have too many challenges in Chicago and our country to keep re-fighting 40 year old battles."

Obama Speaks Out On Last Night's Debate

He’s No Journalist


By Al Giordano

When George Stephanopoulos left the Clinton White House and went straight to ABC News, he had never worked as a reporter - not in newspapers, nor on radio, nor on television. His only career experience was as a political hack, whose job in politics was to manipulate the media, hide the facts, and spin, spin, spin.

He was hired to be an on-air bimbo; a pretty face, and for his “access” and rolodex to other political celebrities and figures. And in his years at ABC, an army of producers, reporters and interns have done all the heavy lifting for him.

Had he any experience or background in journalism, he would have been familiar with the basic tenets of ethics codes that major media purport to follow. Every single news organization insists that conflicts-of-interest and even “the appearance of conflict-of-interest” must be openly disclosed by a reporter on a story. Take the Associated Press Managing Editors Association Statement of Ethical Principles, for example:

“The newspaper and its staff should be free of obligations to news sources and newsmakers. Even the appearance of obligation or conflict of interest should be avoided.”

At times there are conflicts presented by previous employment - in this case, Stephanopoulos’ high-level role in the Clinton Administration of the 1990s. In those cases, a simple disclosure during a broadcast or a news story is necessary. But we didn’t hear that from Stephanopoulos or anyone else at ABC last night, as he steered the first 50 minutes of the debate away from policy issues (Iraq, health care, “free trade,” jobs, the environment, etcetera) and into what everybody today knows was a transparent attempt to give oxygen to the spouse of his former employer and to trash her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination.

As a journalist, a professor of journalism, and the president of an international journalism school, I look at this guy and understand exactly why so many people have grown to distrust our profession. A lot of people obsess and fret about Fox News, or Rush Limbaugh, or others that at least don’t pretend to be “objective” and “unbiased” (or even journalists!) but the real cancer on journalism today is in the mainstream and its lackeys that claim that they are: in this case ABC and its resident political airhead George Stephanopoulos, who deserves all the blowback and more that is heading back at him today.

Oklahoma Superdelegate Endorses Obama

Chicago, IL - Today, Oklahoma Superdelegate Reggie Whitten endorsed Barack Obama, citing his ability to unite Americans for change and his proven track record of standing up for middle class families and workers.

His statement regarding the endorsement is below:

"I have decided to endorse Senator Barack Obama and will work wholeheartedly to see him become the next President of the United States. Some say there is no particular need to endorse at the present time. However, I believe this is a defining moment, not only for our Party, but also more importantly for our country. Therefore, I made the decision to commit now.

“While deciding to support Senator Obama, I thought of my history and my future. I'm from the small town of Seminole, Oklahoma: a city that is predominantly hard-working middle class citizens. It is important that our next President keep small towns like Seminole in mind when he talks about our economy. I am very sincere in my belief that Senator Obama will do just that. When I talk about my future, I, like most people, think of my children. The next administration will have a great deal to say about their future and the world they inherit. As a parent, I am confident Senator Obama has the courage, skill, and experience necessary to lead America forward.

“Whether it is his willingness to tell corporate America what it needs to hear instead of what it wants to hear, restoring America's standing abroad, or inspiring young Americans to commit themselves to public service, Senator Obama's message is equally refreshing and inspiring. It is no coincidence that voters, especially young voters, are turning out to vote in record numbers.

“As we move closer to the convention and, from there, to the general election in November, I am certain Senator Obama will continue to build a broad coalition of Democrats, Independents, and yes, even Republicans. He unites us in the belief that without change in Washington, we as a nation cannot begin to address the challenges and opportunities of our future.

“In conclusion, for these reasons and many more, I'm proud today to stand with Barack Obama and his growing movement for change."

Superdelegate Harry Thomas Jr. Switches From Hil to Obama

April 17, 2008

From the Washington Post ...

Washington D.C. Council member and newly elected superdelegate Harry Thomas Jr., initially a supporter of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, is announcing in minutes that he will cast his vote at the Democratic National Convention in Denver for Sen. Barack Obama.

Thomas received more than 100 phone calls and e-mails from constituents who feared that he would use his power as a superdelegate to vote for Clinton despite the city's overwhelming support of Obama in the Potomac Primary.

"After meeting with the candidates and listening to my constituents, I have to honor the 83 percent who support Barack Obama," he said in an interview, referring to the results of the Democratic primary...

Pennsylvania Voters Reject Hillary’s Old-Politics Attacks, Switch to Obama


Susan Petro was joined by other Pennsylvanians from around the state who shared the following stories:

Victoria King, Johnstown:

You know, sometimes it’s not what you say; it’s how you say it. Barack Obama is focused on the issues that matter to people. Hillary Clinton just exploits them. Barack Obama is the right type of leader to bring our country together and that’s what we need right now.

Cindy Scales, Johnstown:

Hillary Clinton’s negative campaigning really turned me off. Her negativity is not doing anything but separating Democrats at a time when we need to come together. People don’t need that message. What they need is financial security, good jobs, faith in this country and a hopeful future.

Dar Thomas, Pittsburgh:

I really wanted to vote for a woman, but what really changed my mind is how divisive she is. The more I watched her, the more I saw how her campaign uses cheap shots to attack Barack Obama. She has employed these win-at-any-cost tactics. That shows she really knows political gaming, but she doesn’t really know that Americans just want someone to help them solve their problems.

Dawn Moyer, Collegeville:

The negative campaigning had a lot to do with why I no longer support Hillary Clinton. She is the old Washington politics. We absolutely need a change. I believe in Barack Obama and I believe he is what our nation needs.

Elizabeth Harrison, Glenside:

The policy of personal attacks is one that for years have made me view Washington in a very bad light. Why can't we act like grown ups? I began this race as a Hillary supporter but when the kitchen sink mess began, I began to get discouraged. The sad part of all of this is that Mr. Obama has not once attempted to make personal attacks against her even when it could have sincerely been to his advantage to do so. I want something different for my children from Washington…from America. I think deep down inside, we are all ready.

June Esser, Creighton:

I was really confused about whether I wanted Hillary or Barack. But I have decided I am voting for Barack. Each time he is hit with mud he comes back with a sincere and reasonable response. Enough of these political games.

You can make a difference in your community by signing up to Get Out the Vote

Philadelphia Daily News Endorses Barack Obama

Posted on Thu, Apr. 17, 2008

THE CHOICE in Tuesday's Democratic presidential primary is not only the one between a white woman and a black man. It's a choice between the past and the future.

More specifically, the nation must decide how to face the future racing toward us in the form of slumping home sales, unstable financial markets and increased joblessness - and staring at us from the Green Zone in Iraq and the beds at veterans hospitals.

Should Democrats choose someone who will employ hard-won - even bitter - experiences gained in a past Democratic administration, or reach beyond political truisms toward a new (and untried) model of governing?

Neither choice is obvious. Perhaps that's why the race has gone on for so long.

But the long slog through 44 primaries and caucuses has confirmed for us that Sen. Barack Obama's vision of change - and the way he plans to pursue it - is what we need right now. Badly.

This is a campaign that really began six years ago, on Sept. 11, 2001. Not only was the U.S. attacked and seriously wounded, it did not bounce back the way "the land of the free and home of the brave" should have. In fact, it still suffers from post-traumatic stress.

That day and its aftermath cried out for a revolution of values: a clear-eyed shared vision, a cooperative effort, a unified purpose. It cried out for a recognition that conventional warfare and conventional responses to domestic challenges in an era of globalization were not enough.

That cry was not answered.

Instead, the Bush administration embarked on an unconscionable plan to exploit the fear we all felt that day for political gain. It lied us into a disastrous war in Iraq, a staggering, record deficit at home, a weakening of the constitutional structure on which the country rests, and poisonous lines of division among Americans. It led us to a place where 81 percent of Americans say we're on the wrong track.

Contrary to Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign slogan, we believe Barack Obama is more likely to be "ready on Day One" to lead us in a new direction. Because of his experience.

Sure, Clinton has more "experience" of a sort. For one thing, she has 14 more years on earth. How much of this experience is directly applicable to the job of president is, at best, debatable.

We are frankly troubled by her assumption that her husband's administration and accomplishments were her own. And if her equation holds, that the first spouse is an equal partner in the administration, then the reappearance of Bill Clinton in the White House is a prospect we have a hard time reconciling with the work that needs to be done.

THERE IS a way to match Clinton's and Obama's performances on a relatively equal playing field: their campaigns.

A candidate's campaign may be the best indicator of how she or he will govern. If so, an Obama administration would be well-managed, inclusive and astonishingly broad-based. It would make good use of technology and communicate a message of unity and, yes, hope.

It would not be content with eking out slim victories by playing to the narrow interests of the swing voters of the moment while leaving the rest of the country as deeply divided as ever. Instead, an Obama administration would seek to expand the number of Americans who believe that they have a personal stake in our collective future - and that they have the power to change things.

It would motivate them to hold their representatives accountable for making it happen. That is, after all, the only way to get us out of Iraq, to address global warming, to make us energy-independent. It's the only way to resist the forces arrayed against providing universal health care, rebuilding our infrastructure and returning our schools to world-class status. It's the only way to give our children the means to compete with children in other parts of the world who are healthier, better-educated and have more opportunities than many of our own.

An Obama administration would be freer of the the corrupting influence of big-money donors and corporate interests. Obama has raised $240 million overall, with half coming in contributions of less than $200. People who contribute to political campaigns can feel they "own" a candidate and so Obama would owe allegiance to the wide swath of America that has financed his campaign.

Based on his experience in running a quarter-billion-dollar enterprise with thousands upon thousands of volunteers, we could expect an Obama administration to be well-managed and cost-effective, with the president choosing forward-thinking advisers committed to his program, demanding that they work as a team and pay attention to details.

He would be steady and calm, given neither to irrational exuberance or outbursts of anger. He would make mistakes, that's for sure, but he could be expected to recognize them, adjust, and move forward.

He would adjust his views to reality rather than trying to adjust reality to his views.

Obama's unprecedented appeal to younger voters is significant not only because it expands the electorate, which is vital. It's also a validation of his promise as a president to be free of the baby-boomer/Vietnam/segregation-era hangups.

Younger people are more egalitarian, more accepting of diversity, and more comfortable with rapid change. They also are less confined by old resentments or regrets.

AND AN OBAMA administration would lower the tone of the rhetoric that separates us.

As New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson has said, Obama is a once-in-a-lifetime candidate who has the skill and eloquence to help us raise our eyes and our aspirations beyond individual, personal concerns, beyond religion or region or race or gender, beyond our well-founded fears to a shared destiny.

Most candidates claim that they will change the way business is done in Washington. Barack Obama has made us believe that, yes, he can.

ABC Presidential Debate: Tabloid America

When I was a kid many of us from the neighborhood would band together and play the kids from the school basketball team in a game of horse, or one-on-one. Occasionally the star of the team would show up and it soon would become a game of one-on five.

Just like last night's debate sponsored by that bastion of journalism, ABC.

A few questions to consider:

1. How do you allow George Stephanopoulos, a former Clinton administration staffer now masquerading as a journalist, anywhere near a debate that includes Hillary Clinton?

2. How was it that ABC camera operators did nearly a dozen close-up shots of Chelsea and other Clinton supporters during statements by Hillary? (note that ABC even lit Chelsea's row with soft yellow light) How was it that there were no shots of Obama family or supporters during the event?

3. How can you moderate the first fifty minutes of a debate with no questions of policy and issues? How is it that the majority of those questions were directed at Senator Obama concerning his past associations and statements - save one question for Hillary on Bosnia?

4. How is it that Hillary admits she has lied about Bosnia and there is not one follow-up question from Charlie or George?

5. How are there no questions during the entire debate about Mark Penn, Columbia, the Clinton income taxes, or any exploration of Bill's relationship to Columbia?

I could go on and on - but what's the point? ABC conducted a hatchet job of a debate and should lose their license to broadcast anything.

Charlie Gibson should be ashamed of himself, as he knows better.

All in all, Obama, playing against a stacked deck of Clinton, Stephanopoulos, Gibson, McCain, and the phantoms of tabloid innuendo - did a fine and noble job.

One might say, he looked Presidential.

zjm

P.S. The good, just, and bemusing news - American Idol drew millions more viewers than ABC'S bad popcorn show -

April 16, 2008

Debate Moment of Truth

After expending an extraordinary amount of time, money, and effort trashing Obama's ability to win a general election against John McCain - both on the campaign trail and in her unsuccessful attempts to woo superdelegates like Bill Richardson, Hillary was finally pushed to declare the truth in tonight's debate:
"Hey Hil, you're last argument is gone..." zjm

Can Obama win?

‘Yes, yes, yes,’ says Clinton

Decision Time: Talk With You After the Debate

25 Of 35 South Dakota Democratic State Legislators Endorse Obama

SIOUX FALLS, SD – Today, twenty-five of the thirty-five South Dakota Democratic State Legislators endorsed Barack Obama, citing him as the only candidate who can unite Americans for change that matters in the lives of working families in South Dakota.

South Dakota Senate Democratic Leader Scott Heidepriem said, "Senator Obama inspires all Americans, regardless of party, race or economic circumstance. He is the best chance we have had in years to lift the spirit and lead the way."

South Dakota House Democratic Leader Dale Hargens said, "Senator Obama has given us a reason to believe that we can change the way things are done in Washington. He will be able to bring an end to the bitter divisions in our nation's capital that hinder good decision making and prevent implementation of sound solutions."

Senator Obama said, “I’m proud to receive the backing of these legislators today. We are working hard to strengthen our growing grassroots movement for change in South Dakota before the primary on June 3, and we’re grateful that these leaders will help build our support throughout the state.”

Obama has the support of Former Majority Leader Tom Daschle, and has been endorsed by Senator Tim Johnson and Congresswoman Stephanie Herseth Sandlin. Last week, six Tribal Leaders from South Dakota endorsed Barack Obama.

Below is the list of South Dakota State Legislators Endorsing Barack Obama today:

Senator Julie Bartling
Senator Gary Hanson
Senator Scott Heidepriem
Senator Alan Hoerth
Senator Jim Hundstad
Senator Sandy Jerstad
Senator Tom Katus
Senator Frank Kloucek
Senator Ryan Maher
Senator Ben Nesselhuf
Senator Jim Peterson
Senator Nancy Turbak Berry
Senator Theresa Two Bulls
Representative Jim Bradford
Representative Quinten Burg
Representative H. Paul Dennert
Representative Richard Engels
Representative David Gassman
Representative Clayton Halverson
Representative Dale Hargens
Representative Larry Lucus
Representative Garry Moore
Representative Eldon Nygaard
Representative Bill Thompson
Representative Tom Van Norman

North Carolina Superdelegates Watt, Price Endorse Obama

LISA ZAGAROLI and DAVID INGRAM

Two N.C. superdelegates endorsed U.S. Sen. Barack Obama for president Wednesday.

U.S. Reps. Mel Watt and David Price held a conference call to announce their decision to endorse Obama over Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York.

“Only one candidate in this election has captured this spirit of change and excitement,” Watt, a Charlotte Democrat, told reporters. “Only one candidate has marshaled this spirit of change into a movement that is completely inclusive, uniquely democratic and uniquely American. That candidate is Barack Obama.”

Price, a Chapel Hill Democrat, said Obama would be competitive in North
Carolina with expected Republican nominee John McCain in November.

“He can change the equation in North Carolina,” Price said, “and I look forward to helping him do so.”

The endorsements mean Obama has the public support of six N.C. superdelegates compared to Clinton’s one - Charlotte City Council member Susan Burgess - according to the Democratic Convention Watch blog.

All the Democrats in the N.C. congressional delegation had endorsed former U.S. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, and until now only one had announced an endorsement of either of the two remaining candidates. U.S. Rep. G.K. Butterfield also endorsed Obama.

Watt said undecided members of the delegation are looking at how Clinton and Obama would fare here in November. “They are talking to their constituents and seeing which candidate will take North Carolina most seriously and is likely to have the prospect of winning North Carolina,” Watt said.

Price and Watt are two of the state’s most influential representatives in Washington.

Price, a former Duke political scientist, was first elected to Congress in 1986. He is the most senior Democratic congressman from North Carolina and he chairs an appropriations subcommittee.

Watt, a lawyer, was first elected in 1992. He is chair of a financial services subcommittee - a key post for his hometown - and is a past chair of the Congressional Black Caucus.

While supporting Edwards, Watt told the Observer in January that he was concerned about “whether the electorate would support an African American candidate or a female candidate for president.”

He said race is still a factor any time a black candidate is running for office, but that the country has made progress in recent years.

“I’d have to say I’m surprised - and pleasantly surprised - that Barack’s campaign has continued to build momentum, because I saw at the end of Harvey Gantt’s campaign in 1990 some movement away from Harvey,” said Watt, who managed Gantt’s Democratic campaign for U.S. Senate against Republican incumbent Jesse Helms.

“But, as I say, that was 18 years ago and this is a new day in America and I expect this to be a new outcome in North Carolina,” Watt said.

Obama Surges on Electability, Challenges Clinton on Leadership


Poll Shows Obama Ahead as Candidate Dems See as Most Likely to Win in November

ANALYSIS by GARY LANGER

April 16, 2008 —

Barack Obama has knocked down one of the three tent poles of Hillary Clinton's campaign for president, surging ahead of her as the candidate Democrats see as most likely to win in November. He's challenging her on leadership as well, leaving only experience as a clear Clinton advantage in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll.

On the eve of their debate before the Pennsylvania primary next week, Democrats by a 2-1 margin, 62-31 percent, now see Obama as better able to win in November -- a dramatic turn from February, when Clinton held a scant 5-point edge on this measure, and more so from last fall, when she crushed her opponents on electability.